Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:62368 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750775AbXFLITl (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:19:41 -0400 Subject: Re: [Take 2] mac80211 IEEE802.11e/WMM code cleanup From: Zhu Yi To: Tomas Winkler Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240706120037g767a330fsa1e838f378ce2b58@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070611085950.GA5540@mail.intel.com> <1181584907.29767.30.camel@johannes.berg> <1ba2fa240706120037g767a330fsa1e838f378ce2b58@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:18:33 +0800 Message-Id: <1181636314.4758.30.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 10:37 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > This is correct that power save must be disabled explicitly in this > implementation. Usually you want to establish DLS for increasing > throughput so you won't go to power save mode anyway. Right. > One other thing is encryption, the path for peer key handshake must be > opened in mac80211 in addition to this patch. Authentication or encryption? I don't think either mac80211 or wpa_supplicant supports IBSS WPA/WPA2 currently, right. For WEP, it should work since both DLS peers use the same key as set in the AP. Thanks, -yi