Return-path: Received: from styx.suse.cz ([82.119.242.94]:58707 "EHLO mail.suse.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966859AbXFHI6z (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 04:58:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 10:59:00 +0200 From: Jiri Benc To: Larry Finger Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Berg , Michael Wu Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: rc80211_lowest, a dumb rate control algorithm Message-ID: <20070608105900.4c401e14@griffin.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <4668A7E5.3070500@lwfinger.net> References: <4661bc4f.88st9yXgySnzwVtb%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <20070607221939.444e9d74@griffin.suse.cz> <20070607222113.0f752bf8@griffin.suse.cz> <20070607222210.1a445cd7@griffin.suse.cz> <4668A7E5.3070500@lwfinger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:50:45 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > I do not think this particular rate control algorithm is needed. A patch has been submitted that > will allow the user to use the SIOCSIWRATE ioctl to lock in a rate. In addition, a patch that > changes rc80211_simple to set the initial rate to the lowest supported value has also been > submitted. With these two alternatives, everything that this proposed module does is supported in > other ways. Ok. I'd still like to apply the patch allowing to change rate control algorithm, but I'd like to hear Johannes' comments first - I suspect he won't like what I did with his macros :-) Jiri -- Jiri Benc SUSE Labs