Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:57454 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751781AbXF1RdG (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:33:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] debug workqueue deadlocks with lockdep From: Johannes Berg To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Linux Kernel list , linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <1183048429.4089.1.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1182969638.4769.56.camel@johannes.berg> <1183048429.4089.1.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hKxaA+x3qOVrHv+4Lq6Z" Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:33:21 +0200 Message-Id: <1183052001.4089.2.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-hKxaA+x3qOVrHv+4Lq6Z Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 18:33 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > I think I misunderstood how lockdep works because the output was > actually wrong, should the key be part of the workqueue_struct as well? No, that's not right either, but Arjan just helped me a bit with how lockdep works and I think I have the right idea now. Ignore this for now, I'll send a new patch in a few days. johannes --=-hKxaA+x3qOVrHv+4Lq6Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGg/Dh/ETPhpq3jKURAjddAJ9YQtTPMEbFM5zKxN9YWs+3gpuPYQCgodvk /2MzgMCk7jqPK1XcFKe7aew= =kBZb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hKxaA+x3qOVrHv+4Lq6Z--