Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:3565 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751990AbXFLOYk (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:24:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:02:17 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Jiri Benc Cc: yi.zhu@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Michael Wu Subject: Re: IEEE802.11e/WMM TS management and DLS support Message-ID: <20070612140217.GC310@tuxdriver.com> References: <20070606082152.GA28639@mail.intel.com> <20070607224315.6dadffca@griffin.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20070607224315.6dadffca@griffin.suse.cz> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 10:43:15PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:21:54 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > > This is a patch series for IEEE802.11e/WMM support against > > linux-2.6.22-rc4. > > > > [PATCH 1/3] mac80211: add IEEE802.11e/WMM structures > > [PATCH 2/3] mac80211: IEEE802.11e/WMM TS management and DLS support > > [PATCH 3/3] mac80211: debugfs support for TSM and DLS > I see you already applied those patches. I haven't had a time to look > at the second patch in this resent version yet, but even from the first > and third one it's clear they still need a lot of work (for example, > adding cfg80211 support instead of that debugfs interface isn't going > to be a few lines long patch). > > Please revert them. I think you will agree that Yi has been making a good effort to correct problems identified with this patch series. I think it is best to continue integrating those patches into the wireless-dev tree for now. Once the code is agreeable to those concerned (including a reasonable API for DLS establishment), then we can ask for Yi (or someone else) to submit a clean patchset for sending upstream. As long as the individual patches are focused on a particular feature, git provides facilities for combining patches that are fairly robust and easy to manage. So, creating a clean patchset should be no great hardship. John P.S. The future of wireless-dev is still open for dicussion. I think it can still be useful for integrating "in progress" patches and feeding them to -mm for early testing. However, I definitely would like to reduce the delta between wireless-dev and wireless-2.6 as much as possible and as soon as possible. -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com