Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:41743 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752545AbXGYV06 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:26:58 -0400 Message-ID: <46A7C01F.2050308@garzik.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:26:55 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomas Winkler CC: "John W. Linville" , Zhu Yi , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please pull patch-bomb for iwlwifi References: <20070725085754.GA670@mail.intel.com> <20070725200721.GH7093@tuxdriver.com> <1ba2fa240707251400l784cbad7ja0003b24017c6535@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240707251400l784cbad7ja0003b24017c6535@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Tomas Winkler wrote: > I know you've asked us to review the already submitted 11n/HT patches. > I'm suggesting that we just patch over them otherwise we lost driver > stability and delay the whole process even more. I'm not happy with > this solution myself but to bring the complete solution at once will > make us silent for another period. What do you mean, "patch over them"? If this means dual solutions for the same problem, it's not very enticing. Jeff