Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:44563 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753096AbXGJNuj (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:50:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] major mac80211 restructuring/cleanups From: Johannes Berg To: Jiri Benc Cc: John Linville , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070710153456.471e395e@logostar.upir.cz> References: <20070621221603.778432000@sipsolutions.net> <20070710153456.471e395e@logostar.upir.cz> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-yMg0YrTVFln/hIGcrWns" Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:50:39 +0200 Message-Id: <1184075439.15565.11.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-yMg0YrTVFln/hIGcrWns Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 15:34 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > But: It would make putting changes currently in wireless-dev to upstream = a > nightmare. I wouldn't be able to take patches in the form they were > committed anymore and would need to heavily modify them. Why? We could just mirror these changes to upstream too. johannes --=-yMg0YrTVFln/hIGcrWns Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGk46v/ETPhpq3jKURAjGmAJ9TOWD9eGdnfSLKOSpZ9RmU2XGNPwCbBC7i 4qlwFKyPmUor3ghFC3OHhwM= =EDOq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-yMg0YrTVFln/hIGcrWns--