Return-path: Received: from purr.warmcat.com ([87.106.142.209]:56076 "EHLO mailserver.mog.warmcat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753216AbXGaMTt (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:19:49 -0400 Message-ID: <46AF28E2.9050905@warmcat.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:19:46 +0100 From: Andy Green MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivo van Doorn CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt73usb-add-bluenext-148f-2573 References: <20070731115446.5717.37617.stgit@localhost> <200707311412.30340.IvDoorn@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200707311412.30340.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> + /* BlueNEXT */ >> + { USB_DEVICE(0x148f, 0x2573), USB_DEVICE_DATA(&rt73usb_ops) }, > > This USB ID is already in the List under the Label "Ralink" > > /* Ralink */ > { USB_DEVICE(0x148f, 0x2573), USB_DEVICE_DATA(&rt73usb_ops) }, Gah! I guess I jumped to the wrong conclusion when it didn't work, because rt2500usb.ko also claims this ID. Blacklisting rt2500usb and "adding" the ID in rt73usb got me able to do monitor mode, but I guess blacklisting rt2500usb was what did the trick. Sorry for the noise, but maybe the same ID in rt2500usb should be removed, unless there is some story here about ID reuse... -Andy