Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:18721 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752570AbXGZB5u (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:57:50 -0400 Subject: Re: Please pull patch-bomb for iwlwifi From: Zhu Yi To: "John W. Linville" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070725200721.GH7093@tuxdriver.com> References: <20070725085754.GA670@mail.intel.com> <20070725200721.GH7093@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:55:42 +0800 Message-Id: <1185414943.3131.53.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:07 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > I have applied these to the wireless-dev tree. It is available now: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-dev.git Thanks. I also see you move it to the drivers/net/wireless. Good! > Does the current driver (as posted) depend on mac80211 patches which > are not upstream at this time? The code requires those mac80211 features are all protected by ifdef CONFIG_IWLWIFI_HT or CONFIG_IWLWIFI_HT_AGG, which are not enabled this time. When the mac80211 HT and AGG features are reviewed and merged, we will make iwlwifi HT feature selectable in Kconfig. > Do you believe that you have addressed the bulk of the review comments > from the previous posting? I think so. Especially thanks to Adel Gadllah and Ian Schram, they helped to address lots of review items from Jeff and Andrew. I cannot confirm it's 100% done but at least most of them. BTW, we also have developers running PowerPC, so endian issues will also be addressed in practice more than good habit of coding. Thanks, -yi