Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:46249 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754198AbXGJOu7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:50:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] major mac80211 restructuring/cleanups From: Johannes Berg To: Jiri Benc Cc: John Linville , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070710162912.17899683@logostar.upir.cz> References: <20070621221603.778432000@sipsolutions.net> <20070710153456.471e395e@logostar.upir.cz> <1184075439.15565.11.camel@johannes.berg> <20070710162912.17899683@logostar.upir.cz> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hUrUcHZBtd50icd181CD" Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:51:18 +0200 Message-Id: <1184079079.15565.13.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-hUrUcHZBtd50icd181CD Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:29 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > But even if it can be applied upstream, it doesn't solve anything. Imagin= e > a patch which was merged into wireless-dev before this restructuring and > which is not upstream. Merging it upstream would mean taking the patch fr= om > wireless-dev git and manually modifying it to fit a new structure. And we > have a bunch of such patches which should go to 2.6.24 (yes, I really > mean .24). Perhaps I'm lazy, but I'd like to avoid that. It's going to be= a > lot of unpleasant work even without this... Which all goes to say that pushing mac80211 for .22 was too fast. joahnnes --=-hUrUcHZBtd50icd181CD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGk5zm/ETPhpq3jKURAox/AKCsldD0TQKUzG2+660NdBq7Gfpm1gCcCGP1 ZmwQSDZehCgucU+NTharUwI= =cL7Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hUrUcHZBtd50icd181CD--