Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:49146 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S970961AbXHMJCA (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:02:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] mac80211: dynamic wep From: Johannes Berg To: Michael Wu Cc: Volker Braun , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Benc In-Reply-To: <200708130054.57899.flamingice@sourmilk.net> References: <200708130054.57899.flamingice@sourmilk.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jnlH6hgDIL3aiMYwN5Z9" Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:54:43 +0200 Message-Id: <1186995283.27916.60.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-jnlH6hgDIL3aiMYwN5Z9 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 00:54 -0700, Michael Wu wrote: > This part seems fairly evil. I suspect a better solution here is to allow= =20 > unencrypted frames when the interface is dormant (netif_dormant()) and th= en=20 > we might be able to get rid of the specific check for WEP. Might that address Tomas's concern with EAPOL too? johannes --=-jnlH6hgDIL3aiMYwN5Z9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGwBxT/ETPhpq3jKURAtm5AKCMC1X3b4SGH98wrNtV3pC+2B4Q7ACffADP xPVDvHmjbFcfWJxMbKUzvyA= =n8XG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jnlH6hgDIL3aiMYwN5Z9--