Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:40319 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759639AbXHCKmT (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Aug 2007 06:42:19 -0400 Subject: Re: mac80211 driver interface semantics From: Johannes Berg To: Andy Green Cc: Ulrich Kunitz , linux-wireless , Daniel Drake In-Reply-To: <46B304FF.3000305@warmcat.com> References: <46B27729.5030406@gentoo.org> <20070803052935.GA12683@deine-taler.de> <46B2E06F.4090706@warmcat.com> <1186134894.4647.24.camel@johannes.berg> <46B3032C.5040306@warmcat.com> <1186137166.4647.34.camel@johannes.berg> <46B304FF.3000305@warmcat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8Ef3KIxq7Cij5X2fk978" Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 12:41:55 +0200 Message-Id: <1186137715.4647.36.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-8Ef3KIxq7Cij5X2fk978 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 11:35 +0100, Andy Green wrote: > Right, but since we marked up the skb "the integrity of the IP checksum > is unknown", if anything wants to use the packet it should re-check it > itself. Won't that do? It'll check the IP checksum anyway since we don't have hardware that checks it as far as I know, but we want to check the FCS. johannes --=-8Ef3KIxq7Cij5X2fk978 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGswZz/ETPhpq3jKURAj/2AKCVve3pYIdmzjGUjdZcSc6i5lo9/gCgpGVz hDgSsNLzfwv3y5wqk442nyY= =9uVO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8Ef3KIxq7Cij5X2fk978--