Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:55095 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753335AbXHBJ6X (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Aug 2007 05:58:23 -0400 Subject: Re: chaning mode only when interface down? From: Johannes Berg To: Andy Green Cc: linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <46B1A14B.2070808@warmcat.com> References: <46B18B77.5020802@gmail.com> <1186046044.24230.11.camel@johannes.berg> <46B1A14B.2070808@warmcat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KixCNoVL2BBhTfvwctTU" Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:59:47 +0200 Message-Id: <1186048787.24230.15.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-KixCNoVL2BBhTfvwctTU Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 10:18 +0100, Andy Green wrote: > NM has some other things that needed fixing last time I looked at it... > it thought it knew better than I did if a wireless interface was in > Monitor mode that I "really wanted it" to be in Managed. Hah yeah that is *really* annoying. Especially if you already have one virtual managed interface and it insists on changing the other one. Luckily, as long as it's up, it doesn't succeed :) johannes --=-KixCNoVL2BBhTfvwctTU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGsasT/ETPhpq3jKURArJjAJ0WmRVu5cvWkPgGOTB7vGk3/61/tACfT5Vx e+T0GwzrQLPSFvKHNtez4zc= =oOhU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KixCNoVL2BBhTfvwctTU--