Return-path: Received: from s131.mittwaldmedien.de ([62.216.178.31]:18048 "EHLO s131.mittwaldmedien.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751049AbXHALPR (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 07:15:17 -0400 From: Holger Schurig To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: libertas: blows chunks on failed firmware load Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:15:10 +0200 Cc: Dan Williams , Andy Green References: <46AF913F.9010006@warmcat.com> <46B01F86.5050406@warmcat.com> <1185966204.29690.2.camel@xo-13-A4-25.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1185966204.29690.2.camel@xo-13-A4-25.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200708011315.10439.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Yeah, I'm wondering whether we should change that... I don't > know what the policy on changing driver names is though, but > given that the driver isn't extensively used yet, we may be > able to. I'd say libertas_cs for card-services cards (CF Cards, PCMCIA etc) libertas_usb for USB cards libertas_sdio for SDIO based cards That makes the names orthogonal :-)