Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:37854 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753982AbXH3PpP (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:45:15 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:45:13 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Johannes Berg Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Jochen Voss , linux wireless list , linville@tuxdriver.com, netdev , bridge@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: oops with recent wireless-dev tree Message-ID: <20070830154513.GV14130@parisc-linux.org> References: <20070829223752.GA6969@seehuhn.de> <1188475530.2963.20.camel@johannes.berg> <20070830074949.7cd25b04@freepuppy.rosehill.hemminger.net> <1188486091.3978.32.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1188486091.3978.32.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Jochen had a patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=118842715026614&w=2 That's exactly the right patch, please add Acked-by: Matthew Wilcox I just checked over the commit that introduced the bug, and I didn't make the same mistake anywhere else. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."