Return-path: Received: from smtp.rutgers.edu ([128.6.72.243]:22883 "EHLO annwn13.rutgers.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S969319AbXHMPul (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:50:41 -0400 From: Michael Wu To: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] mac80211: dynamic wep Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:48:52 -0700 Cc: Volker Braun , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Benc References: <200708130054.57899.flamingice@sourmilk.net> <1186995283.27916.60.camel@johannes.berg> In-Reply-To: <1186995283.27916.60.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2397490.8UWUZAqrst"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Message-Id: <200708130848.53128.flamingice@sourmilk.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --nextPart2397490.8UWUZAqrst Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 13 August 2007 01:54, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 00:54 -0700, Michael Wu wrote: > > This part seems fairly evil. I suspect a better solution here is to allow > > unencrypted frames when the interface is dormant (netif_dormant()) and > > then we might be able to get rid of the specific check for WEP. > > Might that address Tomas's concern with EAPOL too? > Nope, this is just for the privacy mismatch check. -Michael Wu --nextPart2397490.8UWUZAqrst Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGwH1lT3Oqt9AH4aERAhmYAJwNrRSaOVeP37US8Tahuac36YJ/ZwCgyieL 1imMIGp8WMDNLEzI9NefsAU= =egPA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2397490.8UWUZAqrst-- -: To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org: More majordomo info at http: //vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html