Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:53361 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757562AbXHPNRg (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:17:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hostapd: remove vlan stuff From: Johannes Berg To: Jouni Malinen Cc: linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <20070816012239.GQ1415@jm.kir.nu> References: <1187131269.31200.3.camel@johannes.berg> <1187180689.3998.41.camel@johannes.berg> <20070816012239.GQ1415@jm.kir.nu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zcLE+QDgJFIaxLZgtA1V" Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:20:14 +0200 Message-Id: <1187270414.5141.42.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-zcLE+QDgJFIaxLZgtA1V Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 18:22 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote: > This doesn't sound like a good idea. How would macvlan-based alternative > solve the problem of having different group keys for each VLAN? Ah. I never considered that was even possible. Wouldn't it make more sense to allow binding group keys to STAs too, instead of making the only within the interface? That way you could possibly even get hw accel for those. johannes --=-zcLE+QDgJFIaxLZgtA1V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD4DBQBGxE8O/ETPhpq3jKURAnzEAJ9+fwoyKCleBwCzlBoib933RK98owCXVBfW BLSUv6kCg0XC0U0wFevBPw== =3Ol+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zcLE+QDgJFIaxLZgtA1V--