Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:37188 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755838AbXHFKJF (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:09:05 -0400 Subject: Re: further plan wrt. monitor interfaces From: Johannes Berg To: Ulrich Kunitz Cc: Daniel Drake , linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <20070804074616.GA17144@deine-taler.de> References: <1186178959.13315.30.camel@johannes.berg> <46B3B2AD.1040509@gentoo.org> <20070804074616.GA17144@deine-taler.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-BnKyM/2GGhwHnHklUoyn" Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:11:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1186395060.28655.52.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-BnKyM/2GGhwHnHklUoyn Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 09:46 +0200, Ulrich Kunitz wrote: > Just my 2 cents: I wonder, how you would handle the situation, > that a device can support two MACs in parallel?=20 I think you're not thinking about two MACs but rather two MAC addresses, right? If so, yes, not having multiple MAC addresses was an omission in cfg80211 that should be fixed, but I don't think it makes sense to actually have two full MACs. johannes --=-BnKyM/2GGhwHnHklUoyn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGtvO0/ETPhpq3jKURAnxqAKCDGYGMvmx4Uf2ivBJxCSLG6JOqlgCgiV13 OtciDCAI/1mykVOSEr9F37I= =IdHi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-BnKyM/2GGhwHnHklUoyn--