Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:46681 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751127AbXIYSRI (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:17:08 -0400 Subject: Re: Guide on how to submit patches for linux-wireless From: Johannes Berg To: maximilian attems Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <20070925165047.GH19918@baikonur.stro.at> References: <43e72e890709241209obc236eav5eca6c0828052ee1@mail.gmail.com> <20070925165047.GH19918@baikonur.stro.at> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9s1kDrjs/pQU+mHXwqXE" Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:18:18 +0200 Message-Id: <1190744299.18521.318.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-9s1kDrjs/pQU+mHXwqXE Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 18:50 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > please drop the recommendation of the patch 0. > it is a pain not to have it in the start of a serries in git. I disagree. 0/N is good for giving an overview over the patch series. It shouldn't contain info that must be in git, but I think it should be present unless the series is obvious. johannes --=-9s1kDrjs/pQU+mHXwqXE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBG+VDq/ETPhpq3jKURAqBZAJwMbpKlzTTk+sWmMgCS5R7whHbF+wCeIg4+ IXx5Zz7mfAjUwv1OsEmxY3s= =h5IH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9s1kDrjs/pQU+mHXwqXE--