Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:33959 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750741AbXIBOiV (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 10:38:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath5k - License clarification From: Johannes Berg To: Mark Kettenis Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Luis R. Rodriguez" In-Reply-To: <200709021342.l82DgpP4029155@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> References: <200709021342.l82DgpP4029155@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-5ihOtWjGK9PxAayKC54m" Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:39:27 +0200 Message-Id: <1188743967.4028.2.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-5ihOtWjGK9PxAayKC54m Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 15:42 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: [crap that has been reiterated dozens of times] May I remind you that this list is called "linux-wireless" for a reason? It's not called "ath5k-legal-vs-bsd" or "bsd-vs-gpl-flamewar" or such so there really is no reason to create new threads all the time. Thanks, johannes --=-5ihOtWjGK9PxAayKC54m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBG2ssf/ETPhpq3jKURApz+AJ9kLWh02/He62RmNiT07gggbdnoRgCgj3Ts NpZNYvnSwT9Vjz1wA0N+eIQ= =yUnB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5ihOtWjGK9PxAayKC54m--