Return-path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.233]:1137 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753372AbXIARhT (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 13:37:19 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so1082865wxd for ; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:37:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 13:37:18 -0400 From: "Constantine A. Murenin" To: "Jeff Garzik" Subject: Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <46D99FB7.6030505@garzik.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <200709010140.l811eq9H005896@cvs.openbsd.org> <46D99FB7.6030505@garzik.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > > This will hopefully help diminish certain myths about the code licensing. > > What myth? The myth that Theo understands dual licensing? Reyk's code was never dual licensed, so it's not like it even matters to the original dispute. That said, I don't see what exact wording you consider inaccurate. C.