Return-path: Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:34023 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751902AbXITMWP (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:22:15 -0400 To: "Nick Kossifidis" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: AR5006 - should it work? References: <40f31dec0709190755h5ea62e0cv578f2a5ed0788d80@mail.gmail.com> <40f31dec0709191939l6f99b59gd31d5291057692a2@mail.gmail.com> From: Krzysztof Halasa Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:22:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <40f31dec0709191939l6f99b59gd31d5291057692a2@mail.gmail.com> (Nick Kossifidis's message of "Thu, 20 Sep 2007 05:39:33 +0300") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: "Nick Kossifidis" writes: >> Is it possible that a signal which shows as 20/127 on 5004X >> is too weak for 5006X to be detected by scanning? > > Nope it's fine, it might be that 5006X's RF part is not initialized > propertly so it doesn't "hear" 5004X. Thanks. I will try the binary HAL to see if it changes anything, there is always a chance the cards are damaged (not very likely, I have 4 AR5006X). -- Krzysztof Halasa