Return-path: Received: from mx.freeshell.ORG ([192.94.73.19]:55156 "EHLO sdf.lonestar.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755215AbXIAVEi (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 17:04:38 -0400 Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 21:04:19 +0000 From: Jacob Meuser To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath5k - License clarification Message-ID: <20070901210419.GC23642@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> References: <20070901191405.GB10469@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <46D9BFC2.4080707@garzik.org> <20070901200714.GA23642@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <46D9CC46.4060302@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <46D9CC46.4060302@garzik.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 04:32:06PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Or are you one of the followers of The Pattern, which repeats itself on > a regular basis: > > 1) Theo rants about Linux, FSF, and GPL > 2) Rants inspire minions > 3) Theo fans, ignorant of all facts, appear on Linux MLs > to uphold Theo's side of the debate. > > I'm betting the latter. I already explained my reasons for interest. It has nothing to do with what license is which, but about respect for the original author's wishes and the general idea of giving back. why are you attacking me? -- jakemsr@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org