Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:36138 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756268AbXITPx6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:53:58 -0400 Subject: Re: ath5k and network manager From: Dan Williams To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070919214007.1a6a9b4a@freepuppy.rosehill> References: <20070919214007.1a6a9b4a@freepuppy.rosehill> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:51:53 -0400 Message-Id: <1190303513.2016.12.camel@xo-3E-67-34.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 21:40 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Network manager doesn't seem to detect ath5k. Perhaps it is because > it is name "ath0". I think device should follow the convention of using > name "wifi0" rather than BSD convention of putting driver name in device name. NM shouldn't care what the device name is as long as the device has the right tags in HAL and as long as the device doesn't get renamed underneath NM (0.7 svn already uses device indexes internally instead). Dan