Return-path: Received: from mx.freeshell.ORG ([192.94.73.19]:65149 "EHLO sdf.lonestar.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752801AbXIAUHd (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 16:07:33 -0400 Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 20:07:15 +0000 From: Jacob Meuser To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath5k - License clarification Message-ID: <20070901200714.GA23642@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> References: <20070901191405.GB10469@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <46D9BFC2.4080707@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <46D9BFC2.4080707@garzik.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 03:38:42PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Was it slashdot or Theo's rant that made all the OpenBSD fanboys like > you come out of the woodwork? ? I have made contributions to GNU projects, and supplied large patches and new files to GPL'd projects, always keeping the GPL license, not for any reason other than respect for the wishes of the original author. Earlier this year, I went out of my way to a NetBSD developer to change the license of a file he wrote (that added NetBSD/OpenBSD support) from BSD to GPL so it could be included in a GNU project, because the project leader claimed the BSD license was incompatible with GNU projects. The NetBSD developer agreed to the change, but I still have not seen that file added to the project. My interest in this matter goes far beyond my interest as an OpenBSD developer. -- jakemsr@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org