Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:42561 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965341AbXIBMhA (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 08:37:00 -0400 Message-ID: <46DAAE64.3070203@garzik.org> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 08:36:52 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Igor Sobrado CC: Adrian Bunk , Alan Cox , "Constantine A. Murenin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing References: <200709010140.l811eq9H005896@cvs.openbsd.org> <46D99FB7.6030505@garzik.org> <20070901205457.GK9260@stusta.de> <20070902113638.78fbd202@the-village.bc.nu> <20070902115041.GM16016@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Igor Sobrado wrote: > When code is multi-licensed it must be distributed under *all* these > licensing terms concurrently. It is easy to understand. Removing (or > changing) the conditions that apply to the program from the source code > and documentation *without* an authorization from all the author(s) is > illegal. The plain English in the dual-license text directly contradicts this fiction. Jeff