Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:45445 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753851AbXJBUm2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:42:28 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Daniel Drake Subject: Re: What happened with z1211? Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 22:39:09 +0200 Cc: John Linville , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <200710021147.55506.mb@bu3sch.de> <470272CE.60405@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <470272CE.60405@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200710022239.09217.mb@bu3sch.de> (sfid-20071002_214232_538612_440E1CD8) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 02 October 2007 18:33:18 Daniel Drake wrote: > Michael Buesch wrote: > > Hi John, > > > > What happened with the z1211 driver in wireless-2.6? > > It's not there anymore. There's only the old zd1211rw > > and zd1211rw-mac80211 stuff. Did you rename it again? > > We aren't going to rename the driver, we're going to directly port > drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw to mac80211 when we're ready. John has put > it back as zd1211rw-mac80211 for now to allow development to continue. > Don't use the zd1211rw-mac80211 branch though (it won't compile), > develop against 'everything' as usual. When is that port going to happen then? I mean, the drop of z1211 is a huge regression for me, as I am using it in production environment. -- Greetings Michael.