Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:47872 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754469AbXJBVFa (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:05:30 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Daniel Drake Subject: Re: What happened with z1211? Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 23:02:33 +0200 Cc: John Linville , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <200710021147.55506.mb@bu3sch.de> <200710022239.09217.mb@bu3sch.de> <4702B1F7.3040100@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4702B1F7.3040100@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200710022302.33638.mb@bu3sch.de> (sfid-20071002_220534_321275_37C8E115) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 02 October 2007 23:02:47 Daniel Drake wrote: > Michael Buesch wrote: > > When is that port going to happen then? > > I mean, the drop of z1211 is a huge regression for me, as I am > > using it in production environment. > > We're aiming for 2.6.25. Right now zd1211rw-mac80211 does not really > provide any big user advantages over zd1211rw so you should be able to > use the existing driver until then. Well, softmac is crap and has several race conditions that mac8021 does not have. That's the actual problem. ;) -- Greetings Michael.