Return-path: Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:33469 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753071AbXJ3LWI (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:22:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:22:21 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Christoph Hellwig , Jeff Lee Cc: Daniel Hazelton , Ivo van Doorn , Dan Williams , Luis Correia , kernel list , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, mwallis@serialmonkey.com Subject: Licensing of IS89C35 WLAN USB driver [was Re: rt73usb: support for wireless in Kohjinsha subnotebook] Message-ID: <20071030112221.GA17586@elf.ucw.cz> (sfid-20071030_112212_450343_9E1A3044) References: <20071023090808.GB19758@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20071023090808.GB19758@infradead.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi! You are listed as author of IS89C35 802.11bg WLAN USB Driver. That driver has clear MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") tag, but not other notices. Is it safe to assume whole sources are to be distributed under GPLv2? (Or is it GPLv2 or later?) Pavel > > there's nothing to suggest otherwise, and there's explicit: > > > > #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Jeff Lee" > > #define DRIVER_DESC "IS89C35 802.11bg WLAN USB Driver" > > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > > So what about contacting the vendor and asking? -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html