Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:2067 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751748AbXJJTJH (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:09:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:32:51 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Dan Williams Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, proski@gnu.org, hermes@gibson.dropbear.id.au Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] orinoco: more reliable scan handling Message-ID: <20071010183251.GK5962@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20071010_200913_385104_DC353DE3) References: <1191946643.20183.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1191946643.20183.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 12:17:23PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > Bring scan result handling more in line with drivers like ipw. Scan > results are aggregated and a BSS dropped after 15 seconds if no beacon > is received. This allows the driver to interact better with userspace > where more than one process may request scans or results at any time. Are there some orinoco.h changes? This patch seems to refer to orinoco_private fields that don't exist...? John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com