Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:2421 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752858AbXJ0Mun (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:50:43 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:50:25 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Johannes Berg Cc: stable@kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: reorder association debug output Message-ID: <20071027125025.GC16222@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20071027_135046_435282_F05DC60E) References: <11934326793639-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> <11934326801557-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> <11934326803769-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> <11934326803330-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> <11934326811535-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> <11934326813508-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> <1193432681145-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> <1193433039.15686.12.camel@johannes.berg> <20071026212303.GF23415@tuxdriver.com> <1193435078.15686.14.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1193435078.15686.14.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 11:44:38PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > Anyway, this probably got caught-up in a "what recent fixes still > > apply to 2.6.23" sweep. Still, I don't see why this wouldn't be > > desirable for someone running 2.6.23? > > No drivers in 2.6.23 anyway and Intel ships their own mac80211. Why > should we care at all? rtl8187 is in 2.6.23. -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com