Return-path: Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk ([130.88.200.93]:63578 "EHLO serenity.mcc.ac.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753991AbXJBVDZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:03:25 -0400 Message-ID: <4702B1F7.3040100@gentoo.org> (sfid-20071002_220328_824993_D72002E5) Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:02:47 +0100 From: Daniel Drake MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Buesch CC: John Linville , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What happened with z1211? References: <200710021147.55506.mb@bu3sch.de> <470272CE.60405@gentoo.org> <200710022239.09217.mb@bu3sch.de> In-Reply-To: <200710022239.09217.mb@bu3sch.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Michael Buesch wrote: > When is that port going to happen then? > I mean, the drop of z1211 is a huge regression for me, as I am > using it in production environment. We're aiming for 2.6.25. Right now zd1211rw-mac80211 does not really provide any big user advantages over zd1211rw so you should be able to use the existing driver until then. Daniel