Return-path: Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.181]:36604 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759258AbXKLW72 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:59:28 -0500 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so1560694pyb for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:59:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8e6f94720711121459j56f640abid03cb2a1eca319c2@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20071112_225931_921489_FF368EC0) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:59:25 -0500 From: "Will Dyson" To: "Florian Lohoff" Subject: Re: rt2x00/rt2500 PCI unresponsive / sluggish response Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20071111102315.GC10486@paradigm.rfc822.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <20071111102315.GC10486@paradigm.rfc822.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Nov 11, 2007 5:23 AM, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Hi, > i today tried the in tree rt2x00 driver the first time and it immediatly > felt a little sluggish. It sometimes feels a little as the driver is > actually not using interrupts but rather polls at HZ rate or something. > I can actually see the device generating interrupts in /proc/interrupts > but still. > > Machine is a 2Ghz P4 with an PCI Ralink RT2500: > While running an "find /" via ssh the output comes in and a second terminal shows this: That is some pretty nasty latency. You didn't describe the setup for your test, so I don't really have any insight into this problem. You might want to check the wireless bitrate using the "iwconfig" command. If the bitrate is really low, then the network latency problem is explained. When the bitrate is low, it is much easier for a single stream to saturate the connection (making for bad latency). The output of "iwconfig" and "dmesg | grep rt2x00" would really help in debugging this issue. -- Will Dyson