Return-path: Received: from mail.sf-mail.de ([62.27.20.61]:36878 "EHLO mail.sf-mail.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755392AbXKAI31 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 04:29:27 -0400 From: Rolf Eike Beer To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: iwl3945 in 2.6.24-rc1 dies under load Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 09:22:11 +0100 Cc: Pavel Machek , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kernel list , ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, yi.zhu@intel.com References: <20071031005202.GA1534@elf.ucw.cz> <200711010259.05315.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200711010259.05315.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1673292.C95xu0QgPD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Message-Id: <200711010922.19051.eike-kernel@sf-tec.de> (sfid-20071101_082932_690623_B050EF37) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --nextPart1673292.C95xu0QgPD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2007 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > On Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:52, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > ...does not seem to work too well :-(. It connects with the AP > > (good!), and survives some "normal" use, but it died at first big > > tcpspray (baaaad!). > > Is this a regression from 2.6.23? No, iwlwifi was merged after 2.6.23. Eike --nextPart1673292.C95xu0QgPD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHKYy6XKSJPmm5/E4RAjrUAJ4oBX92H4G6Ed1V2zHMZb38LPJfiQCghHVN YdJ8QOH8ZiFuXwvsQegFxrg= =dumL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1673292.C95xu0QgPD--