Return-path: Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.177]:31618 "EHLO ik-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751609AbXKLTsG (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:48:06 -0500 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c28so7588ika for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:48:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] o80211s: (nl80211) support for mesh interfaces and set_mesh_cfg command From: Luis Carlos Cobo To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1194687275.7258.36.camel@johannes.berg> References: <473516df.18bb720a.41e8.5fdc@mx.google.com> (sfid-20071110_022645_005653_498DB7A6) <1194687275.7258.36.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:47:41 -0800 Message-Id: <1194896861.6980.28.camel@localhost> (sfid-20071112_194812_149912_85E33456) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 10:34 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > So if I bring up a mesh interface and don't use SET_MESH_CFG, it won't > operate at all? Yes it would, it would use the wild card, zero-length mesh ID. > I think I'd prefer if the MESH_ID attribute would be given as part of > SET_INTERFACE/NEW_INTERFACE instead of a new command. I'm attempting to > keep nl80211 as object oriented as possible and this single command > doesn't really fit the picture. Will that be the way to specify the SSID for the STA interfaces? If so, I agree it would be better to use that command instead of an additional mesh specific command. As by now it's just used to set the interface type I was not sure it was appropriate to add the mesh configuration there. -- Luis Carlos Cobo Rus GnuPG ID: 44019B60 cozybit Inc.