Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:4177 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752084AbXLDSUi (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:20:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:19:50 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Dan Williams Cc: Dave , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] [try 2] orinoco: more reliable scan handling Message-ID: <20071204181950.GA28285@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20071204_182057_187931_094B9DCB) References: <1191946643.20183.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071010183251.GK5962@tuxdriver.com> <1192074985.31110.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47489C2D.7030606@gmail.com> <1196790166.14628.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1196790166.14628.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:42:46PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 21:48 +0000, Dave wrote: > > > > > > Dan Williams wrote: > > > Bring scan result handling more in line with drivers like ipw. Scan > > > results are aggregated and a BSS dropped after 15 seconds if no beacon > > > is received. This allows the driver to interact better with userspace > > > where more than one process may request scans or results at any time. > > > > I've only seen this recently, and am using it as a basis for some other changes. However I've noticed a couple issues: > > Will clean up these and submit for 2.6.25 then, thanks. The patch is already queued in Jeff's tree. Please send any changes as new patches on top. John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com