Return-path: Received: from s131.mittwaldmedien.de ([62.216.178.31]:22306 "EHLO s131.mittwaldmedien.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750821AbXLMH7g (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:59:36 -0500 From: Holger Schurig To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/T][PATCH 1/3] rc80211-pid: introduce rate behaviour learning algorithm Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:00:24 +0100 Cc: Mattias Nissler , Johannes Berg , Stefano Brivio , "John W. Linville" References: <20071209211547.2d7fca32@morte> <1197384754.4037.23.camel@johannes.berg> <1197393788.7528.5.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1197393788.7528.5.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200712130900.25030.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> (sfid-20071213_075939_591869_357FF779) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > So let's go back to the original issue: Johannes, can we > assume rate control always gets reinitialized when the number > of rates or even the hardware mode is changed? Make sure that at least you reinitialize rate control when you re-associate.