Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:46784 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750873AbXLLRSH (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:18:07 -0500 Subject: privacy_invoked in AP interfaces? From: Johannes Berg To: Jouni Malinen Cc: linux-wireless Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-z0w/LLkzz9/pYBiBCMJV" Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:53:07 +0100 Message-Id: <1197453187.6558.88.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20071212_171811_071957_488FDC1F) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-z0w/LLkzz9/pYBiBCMJV Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I was just testing hostapd and it told me: Could not set PrivacyInvoked for interface wlan0 This is because we only allow setting that for STA interfaces, but what should the setting do for AP interfaces? I don't see any point in it, is there? johannes --=-z0w/LLkzz9/pYBiBCMJV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIVAwUAR1+vgaVg1VMiehFYAQKvwA/+LhepESyxTRk+ERotcAcsDCe/toUwVl/Z MrxNsK7pJ5GZD23U3u72Gg4UDWIzK9+kTLouU2yqoH41J7UdlkhGwuo6GhaPEYKo 5VjBy0rIVSEtw+VriVCUvdt3TY6/OsgekEuM+b+7vhchtpcxl4lMaiFju3f9FtPY mB0XtoDPjMUZHugvTe6mL6DRaVZIpVXqN/CtgszFQQ3dfTWRo6lwbno7cvod++YP xhmyu68sjz6P4A1QK/MSo+z7lmCIPuVXi72wjD+w65zRxpKs4MFHCKyjxJHem45A Jcth4o7zpeHUiMjIGo4vuMFk6Ho3FqhNhbbQoJ+cQSK7aoXBvamWxgvriwSP51Da WzOAWmlW602jy50HkO1oUHwovmGU2jvz6Y/c3kDE9m91A3syWCAbbNXlnqIUvl+1 1i5OaWQFkEFfIh+uZRzrlgXEFQIct+VBB8evlsQuuPmmjtCutsEfvgpNPM1gdRlv sBurFscjm3RShNX4O1wfQEXyTeaSSVjLnF+ZBumyo4yEYQGOm9gzB7nGwnMxnkgN TnEzh60Ofp7urqPf/Dd3MQId6FRHC9fdoqmejaaJ5BcHh1clerxabyG+EUPRXaIf izOUWPDPbFG0Q0FlbbzQRk42dEsZepBpfVurgExafRgP5cSyV4/5sknaakGEJUas W67O8vTK4bs= =9zzX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-z0w/LLkzz9/pYBiBCMJV--