Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:3203 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752297AbYAVPCA (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:02:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:54:32 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Stefano Brivio Cc: Holger Schurig , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please pull 'upstream-davem' branch of wireless-2.6 (2008-01-21) Message-ID: <20080122145432.GB3206@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20080122_150205_025841_B98D790A) References: <20080121202835.GA3065@tuxdriver.com> <200801220856.55024.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> <20080122125400.596ccbeb@morte> <20080122145126.GA3206@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20080122145126.GA3206@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:51:26AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:54:00PM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:56:54 +0100 > > Holger Schurig wrote: > > > > > > Holger Schurig (5): > > > > libertas cs/sdio: fix 'NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08' > > > > > > This patch was originally from Marc Pignat . > > > Should I have made an "Author: " line into the patch then I > > > re-wrote the patch for wireless-2.6/everything ? > > > > In that case, you should add a "From:" line. > > Yes, sorry for any mixup. If forwarding a patch authored by someone > else then please add: > > From: Patch Author > > ...as the first line of the message. Or state that someone else is > the author clearly in the email. I found the original patch in my records. Looking at it now I can see what was intended, but I guess it wasn't clear enough for me to see then. If you'll try to follow the "From: " convention above I'll try to watch more carefully for anomalies like this...deal? :-) John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com