Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.189]:38595 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751746AbYAKBY5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:24:57 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so762359rvb.1 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:24:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: (sfid-20080111_012509_602082_1DB0721A) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:24:54 +0900 From: "Joonwoo Park" To: "Chatre, Reinette" Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] [PATCH 2/5] iwlwifi: iwl3945 synchronize interruptand tasklet for down iwlwifi Cc: "Zhu, Yi" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, lkml , ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <11998765481610-git-send-email-joonwpark81@gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello Reinette, 2008/1/11, Chatre, Reinette : > > Could synchronize_irq() be moved into iwl_disable_interrupts() ? I am At this time, iwl_disable_interrupts() can be called with irq disabled, so for do that I think additional modification would be needed. > also wondering if we cannot call tasklet_kill() before > iwl_disable_interrupts() ... thus preventing it from being scheduled > when we are going down. Thanks for your catch, it seems tasklet can re-enable interrupts. I'll handle and make an another patch for them at this weekend :) Thanks, Joonwoo