Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:4644 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756193AbYAaQcJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:32:09 -0500 Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com (ra.tuxdriver.com [127.0.0.1]) by ra.tuxdriver.com (8.14.0/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m0VGVpOc003284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:31:57 -0500 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ra.tuxdriver.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/Submit) with UUCP id m0VGUjR2003281 for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:30:46 -0500 Received: from linville-t43.mobile (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by linville-t43.mobile (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0VGPE75012849 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:25:15 -0500 Received: (from linville@localhost) by linville-t43.mobile (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m0VGPE6T012848 for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:25:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:25:14 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: wireless mini-summit agenda proposals? Message-ID: <20080131162514.GC6413@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20080131_163214_826363_7C4127E3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Greetings, It looks as if we have a few venue options for a third wireless summit. While this may seem like a luxury, none of the options are perfect for everyone and each has it's own potential drawbacks. So rather than move blindly forward with any given venue, I think it would be good to discuss some potential agenda points. This will serve both to determine who is most interested in attending a summit and who might most need to be there. This will also serve to justify the trouble of having a summit at all. So, I'd like to open the 'floor' to discussion proposals. What discussions pertinent to Linux wireless development do you want to see? What can you contribute to those discussions? How would a face-to-face discussion of that issue be better than an online discussion? If pressed I could make some suggestions. But for now I would like to see what is on the minds of the wireless development community. So, what would do you suggest? Thanks, John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com