Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:56872 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753063AbYAUPva convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:51:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/12] iwlwifi: document scan command Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:51:28 -0800 Message-ID: <4220499A1B034C4FA93B547BA01E1FF0025F5928@orsmsx413.amr.corp.intel.com> (sfid-20080121_155138_021931_9EDD52CC) In-reply-to: <1200688782.5716.38.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1200361585-31801-1-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> <1200361585-31801-2-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> <1200361585-31801-3-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> <1200361585-31801-4-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> <1200361585-31801-5-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> (sfid-20080115_022705_457944_D9860755) <1200441772.5887.167.camel@johannes.berg> <4220499A1B034C4FA93B547BA01E1FF001746541@orsmsx413.amr.corp.intel.com> <1200688782.5716.38.camel@johannes.berg> From: "Cahill, Ben M" To: "Johannes Berg" Cc: "Chatre, Reinette" , , , "Zhu, Yi" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: Johannes Berg [mailto:johannes@sipsolutions.net] > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 3:40 PM > To: Cahill, Ben M > Cc: Chatre, Reinette; linville@tuxdriver.com; > linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Zhu, Yi > Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/12] iwlwifi: document scan command > > > > > iwl4965 will transmit a probe request and go to the next channel > > > before hostapd sends the probe response, iwl4965 still sees the > > > response, but the b43 card never sees the ACK because > it's receiver > > > isn't quite as good as the iwl4965 receiver. > > > > I'm not sure of the history of the dwell time values, but it's an > > attempt to balance reliability of scan vs. speed of scan. > The active > > dwell times are, of course, more speed-aggressive than the > passive ones. > > Would you be willing to experiment with your setup, and try some > > different values? > > Sure, can do that next week, do I just change the defines at > the top of the file? Yes. -- Ben -- > > johannes >