Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:63284 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754591AbYBOX3j (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:29:39 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so626042fga.17 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:29:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47B6205E.9030807@gmail.com> (sfid-20080215_232942_819904_98D574BB) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:29:34 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, Nick Kossifidis Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] WDEV, ath5k, don't return int from bool function References: <1203109133-32217-1-git-send-email-jirislaby@gmail.com> <1203109133-32217-2-git-send-email-jirislaby@gmail.com> <43e72e890802151408g35fa2e49r5eb8557e4a5bbce4@mail.gmail.com> <47B61473.7060206@gmail.com> <43e72e890802151524q4690f589hcc29ea8645b1d843@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43e72e890802151524q4690f589hcc29ea8645b1d843@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/16/2008 12:24 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> You mean to consider 0 as supported, -ENODEV/-EOPNOTSUPP as >> unsupported and the rest as error? >> > > Yeap, what do you think? I have no opinion in this case, which one do you (all) like more?