Return-path: Received: from lunatiki.de ([85.214.70.22]:40566 "EHLO h1112006.serverkompetenz.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752368AbYBQVh5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:37:57 -0500 From: Patrick Grimm To: Richard Scherping Subject: Re: [HOTFIX] Re: mac80211/iwl4965: ad-hoc broken in 2.6.25-rc1 Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:37:57 +0100 Cc: "Chatre, Reinette" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <47B1F422.4060501@scherping.de> <47B60044.9000801@scherping.de> <200802160119.07856.patrick@lunatiki.de> In-Reply-To: <200802160119.07856.patrick@lunatiki.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200802172237.57638.patrick@lunatiki.de> (sfid-20080217_213801_174924_D4C21EAC) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Samstag, 16. Februar 2008 01:19:07 schrieb Patrick Grimm: > Am Freitag, 15. Februar 2008 22:12:36 schrieb Richard Scherping: > > Chatre, Reinette schrieb: > > >>> One more question ... did ad-hoc work for you before this patch? > > >> > > >> No. In my tests only ipw3945 works in Ad-Hoc mode. > > > > > > ok - that explains things. The patch assumes that ad-hoc mode is > > > working, which is unfortunately not the case. We have to fix this. > > > > > > Reinette > > > > As I said, I have tested with iwl4965 only. Seems as if there are more > > problems with ad-hoc and iwl3945. Did ad-hoc work in the "old" iwl3945 > > (before the API change with old version 1.1.17, compared to new version > > 1.2.23/26)? > > I have made some short tests with my working kernel 2.6.23. With 2 Ad-Hoc Nodes. > Version 1.1.17 - 1.1.22 Ad-Hoc mode is working. > Version 1.1.23 - Ad-Hoc mode is not working. The iwlwifi versions 1.1.17 - everything is not working with more then 2 Ad-Hoc Nodes. Please keep me updated I will test your patches again. Patrick