Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:2440 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751122AbYBRQCG (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:02:06 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:27:35 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: bruno randolf Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Upstream wireless process changes Message-ID: <20080218152735.GA3098@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20080218_160212_198703_DAD89393) References: <20080214225728.GC2981@tuxdriver.com> <200802181129.14291.bruno@thinktube.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200802181129.14291.bruno@thinktube.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:29:14AM +0900, bruno randolf wrote: > On Friday 15 February 2008 07:57:28 John W. Linville wrote: > > Finally, a new wireless-testing tree will be created to replace the > > usage of the former 'everything' branch. This tree will be based > this might be a stupid question, but which tree do you expect us to base > regular development patches on? i basically don't really care when my patches > are merged upstream, and i don't know enough about upstream processes to > decide that, so i think i'll better leave that decision up to you :) I guess I wasn't as clear as I thought I was... :-) Please use wireless-testing as your primary development target. Thanks! John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com