Return-path: Received: from ascomax.hasler.ascom.ch ([139.79.135.1]:48800 "EHLO ascomax.hasler.ascom.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758142AbYBVXH6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:07:58 -0500 Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:07:10 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Dan Williams Cc: Andrew Lunn , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Zhu Yi , Reinette Chatre Subject: Re: Link Quality stats not updating, recieved_channel Message-ID: <20080222230710.GB7771@donkey.ma.tech.ascom.ch> (sfid-20080222_230810_459966_D7BD89A7) References: <20080222142614.GA18830@donkey.ma.tech.ascom.ch> <1203714351.4422.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080222212103.GA7771@donkey.ma.tech.ascom.ch> <1203718453.4422.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1203718453.4422.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Yeah; you're right. I'm not sure there's a good way to do this unless > there's some way the ipw2100 passes back the channel number each frame > was received on. There is nothing obvious in the structures in the header file. That was my first plan of attack to fix the problem. > But also ignoring the check in update_network() will cause the signal > strength of networks to be lower than they should be, because the frame > bled over to a different channel. Well i would prefer to have lower strengths than way outdated strengths from the first packet received. Andrew