Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:37907 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757016AbYBOAXF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:23:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: RE: [HOTFIX] Re: mac80211/iwl4965: ad-hoc broken in 2.6.25-rc1 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:21:15 -0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20080215_002311_230207_B8200556) In-Reply-To: References: <47B1F422.4060501@scherping.de> <47B487EE.3030401@scherping.de> <200802150040.05188.patrick@lunatiki.de> From: "Chatre, Reinette" To: "Patrick Grimm" Cc: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On , Chatre, Reinette wrote: > On Thursday, February 14, 2008 3:40 PM, Patrick Grimm wrote: >> For me not. >> I use 3945ABG card in an ad-hoc network with 4 other wlan devices >> like rt2500 and ath5k. I have applied your >> 0001-iwlwifi-only-check-for-association-id-when-associat.patch >> patch. But i can't see incoming packets witch tcpdump. >> I have try to commet out the check for associat with the same >> result. >> >> dmesg >> iwl3945: I iwl3945_rx_handle r = 76, i = 75, REPLY_3945_RX, 0x1b >> iwl3945: I iwl3945_rx_handle r = 77, i = 76, REPLY_3945_RX, 0x1b >> iwl3945: I iwl3945_mac_tx enter >> iwl3945: I iwl3945_tx_skb Dropping - !iwl3945_is_associated >> iwl3945: I iwl3945_mac_tx leave >> iwl3945: I iwl3945_rx_handle r = 78, i = 77, REPLY_3945_RX, 0x1b >> iwl3945: I iwl3945_rx_handle r = 79, i = 78, REPLY_3945_RX, 0x1b > > When you say "with the same result" does it mean that you comment out > the check for priv->assoc_id and you still see the error "Dropping - > !iwl3945_is_associated" or do you then see traffic with tcpdump? > > Could you please print out the values of fc, priv->iw_mode, > iwl3945_is_associated(priv) and priv->assoc_id just before that error > message is printed? One more question ... did ad-hoc work for you before this patch? Thanks Reinette