Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.189]:51375 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755549AbYBYToI (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:44:08 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so1103571rvb.1 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:44:06 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13 v2] o11s: mesh interface support for mac80211 From: Luis Carlos Cobo To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Stefano Brivio In-Reply-To: <1203693709.7082.35.camel@johannes.berg> References: <47be76f9.03b48c0a.025f.54f4@mx.google.com> (sfid-20080222_071727_691746_9DC8AC76) <1203693709.7082.35.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:45:45 -0800 Message-Id: <1203968745.6929.30.camel@localhost> (sfid-20080225_194425_608447_2EC81F79) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 16:21 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > - We no longer use directly rtnetlink for mesh peer link and mesh paths > > operation, and use nl80211 instead. > > Nice too. What does libertas currently do btw? > iwpriv... > > I would like to point out that it looks like we can get duplicate sta_entries, > > or more entries than the maximum allowed, if stas are added at the same time > > through normal network behavior and manual operation through nl80211. Please > > correct me if I am wrong or if it is just that no interface type is supposed to > > allow both kinds of additions. > > I think I CC'ed you on the patch fixing that, no? Not sure which patch are you talking about, anyway I will check that along with the mesh + sta_info changes testing. -- Luis Carlos Cobo Rus GnuPG ID: 44019B60 cozybit Inc.