Return-path: Received: from eazy.amigager.de ([213.239.192.238]:48820 "EHLO eazy.amigager.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752464AbYBFLS7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:18:59 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:45:13 +0100 From: Tino Keitel To: Jiri Slaby Cc: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFT 1/1] single_chip test Message-ID: <20080206104513.GA12496@eazy.amigager.de> (sfid-20080206_111903_763935_39126AFB) References: <20080206014131.9d489a34.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1202294560-7313-1-git-send-email-jirislaby@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1202294560-7313-1-git-send-email-jirislaby@gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:42:40 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 02/05/2008 11:57 PM, Tino Keitel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I tried the current git (9ef9dc69d4167276c04590d67ee55de8380bc1ad) and > > got the following error message from ath5k: > > > > ath5k_pci 0000:02:00.0: registered as 'phy0' > > ath5k phy0: failed to resume the MAC Chip > > ath5k_pci: probe of 0000:02:00.0 failed with error -5 > > We failed to resume after a hardware reset here for a whole second. Is there any > version of ath5k which worked for you (is this a regression)? No, this was my first try with ath5k. > I suspect ath5k_hw_nic_wakeup being called before setting ah_single_chip in > ath5k_hw_attach. Could you test the attached patch? Thanks, I'll try the patch this evening. Regards, Tino