Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([85.10.199.196]:60218 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765048AbYBMX4Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:56:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:56:21 +0100 From: Sebastian Siewior To: Dan Williams Cc: "Chatre, Reinette" , "zHU, yI" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ipw2100-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [RFT] ipw2200: fix ucode assertion for RX queue overrun Message-ID: <20080213235621.GA10003@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> (sfid-20080213_235632_908105_D764DF4F) References: <1202740070.2806.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 In-Reply-To: <1202740070.2806.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Dan Williams | 2008-02-11 09:27:50 [-0500]: >Restock the RX queue when there are a lot of unused frames so that the >RX ring buffer doesn't overrun, causing a ucode assertion. Backport of >patch "iwlwifi: fix ucode assertion for RX queue overrun". > >Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Tested-by: Sebastian Siewior >Sebastian, can you test and ensure that this works for you? Also, can Yep, it does. >you do some throughput testing to ensure that this patch doesn't cause a >throughput regression? Thanks! 00:49:41 (666.64 KB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [122563640/122563640] this was a wget from the inet and it hits almost my cap. Currently I don't have another local machine where I can test a "local" transfer. Is this okey for you? Sebastian