Return-path: Received: from element.ksp.sk ([158.195.16.154]:54818 "EHLO element.ksp.sk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765513AbYCGUhu (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:37:50 -0500 Message-ID: <47D1A7AC.6010307@work.ksp.sk> (sfid-20080307_203755_474038_5BDDA107) Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:38:04 +0100 From: Vladimir Koutny MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "John W. Linville" , mcgrof@gmail.com CC: Michael Buesch , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.24, mac80211 and b/g switching References: <47D160E4.3040503@work.ksp.sk> <1204909966.6387.31.camel@johannes.berg> <47D17EDF.4010100@work.ksp.sk> <200803071916.28776.mb@bu3sch.de> <20080307193429.GA5561@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20080307193429.GA5561@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: John W. Linville wrote: >>> Do you think that taking mac80211 from wireless-2.6 (or -testing or >>> whatever) would cause way too many conflicts when merged back to 2.6.24? >>> Or am I on my own to fix this somehow in 2.6.24? >> OpenWRT ported a rather recent mac80211 back to 2.6.23. So it shouldn't be too hard. > > Current 2.6.24-based Fedora kernels take current mac80211 bits fairly easily. Ok, thanks for this info, I might change my plans then. I'll try this way first, or (if that fails) the compat-wireless-2.6 path suggested by Luis. Thanks, Vlado > > John